CLIFF-top residents have devised a �900,000 scheme they hope will stop Sidmouth’s crumbling coastline from claiming their homes

CLIFF-top residents have devised a �900,000 scheme they hope will stop Sidmouth’s crumbling coastline from claiming their homes.

Householders say a 210 metre-long granite revetment can halt rapid erosion of the town’s east cliff and Pennington Point.

They fear having to one day abandon their homes as gardens topple into the sea at a rate of 13ft a year.

Frustrated residents turned activists say blueprints will protect �6 million of property, save Alma Bridge and nearby footpaths – worth more than �1 million – and prevent central Sidmouth from suffering ‘incalculable’ flood damage.

Members of the newly formed Cliff Road Action Group marched on Knowle to hand in a planning application to East Devon District Council (EDDC) on Tuesday.

“It’s all too easy to ignore these issues until they affect you personally and directly, but that can be too late,” said leading campaigner Paul Griew.

“Everyone who lives in beautiful Sidmouth – and thousands of summer visitors too – benefit from the beaches and the cliff walks and assume the town is safe from flooding. But, unless action is taken to protect the east cliff, nothing can be taken for granted.”

Cliff Road residents said an ‘apparent lack of interest’ from authorities in the face of ‘rapidly accelerating erosion’ prompted them to devise their own plans.

They hope proposals for the five metre-high retaining wall, drawn up with the help of local civil engineers, will ‘inject a new sense of urgency’ into the situation.

Driving forces blame rock islands off Sidmouth beach, created in 1995, for a surge in ‘man made’ cliff erosion. They say the first Cliff Road home could be claimed by the sea in just 15 years and want to halt the trend to a ‘natural’ rate of just around 0.15 metres a year. Planning authority EDDC will ‘consider the application on its merits in due course’.

A spokesman added: “There is a tension between coastal protection and allowing natural processes of erosion. There are strong lobbies for both approaches.”