Sidmouth car park given 'unique' status - and new parking rules
- Credit: LDRS
A popular Sidmouth car park will have new charges and time limits from April, after councillors agreed to grant it ‘unique’ status.
Roxburgh short-stay car park will be re-designated as a shoppers’ car park with a “strictly enforced maximum stay of just two hours,” an East Devon District Council report revealed.
The tariff will be a minimum of 75p for 30 minutes' parking and £1.50 per hour. Even permit holders – local residents who pay £10 per month – will be limited to two hours at a time.
A £2-a-day winter parking offer will continue between October and March each year, agreed as part of the new budget approved last month.
It featured controversial increases to charges in the district’s council-run car parks which meant those who use Roxburgh, along with 20 other seaside car parks, were set to pay £2 per hour for the first three hours, with the fourth being free.
They will also go up to £1.50 per hour in six other ‘prime locations’ in a bid to bolster the council’s finances by raising an extra £1.1 million.
However, the council reconsidered its proposal for the Sidmouth facility and has now decided to give it “unique status within the car park portfolio” after a vote at an extraordinary meeting of the council on Tuesday.
The report explained: “In recognition of its value to the town as the car park of choice for local shoppers needing a quick 'in and out' trip to the town, the intention is to re-designate Roxburgh short stay car park as a “shoppers’” car park.
- 1 Man in court accused of torching Ottery woman's car
- 2 Delays on Sidmouth road for Devon County Show
- 3 Help clean up Sidmouth as In Bloom judges' visit approaches
- 4 Play abour real life leaves audience filled with feel good laughter
- 5 Folk Festival gears up to bring Sidmouth to life with music
- 6 Otter Valley councillor welcomes inquiry into sewage discharges into rivers
- 7 Injured pedestrian helped by lifeboat and lifeguard teams
- 8 Part of Donkey Sanctuary closed due to respiratory infection
- 9 Circus proposed for Sidmouth next year
- 10 Pixie Day returns to Ottery – Pictures
“Unlike the other short stay car parks in our portfolio, where the intent is to encourage visitors to take in the various offers and attractions of the town at their leisure, customers at Roxburgh will not be given their additional hour of free parking.”
“It is considered that this will be of benefit to the residents and businesses of Sidmouth and provide an appropriate balance between the needs to service the leisure industry and the local needs of those living and operating businesses in Sidmouth,” the report added.
While the change was voted through, a number of councillors queried why it had not been included in the recently agreed budget.
Some went further and criticised the move, including Councillor Colin Brown (Conservative, Dunkeswell and Otterhead), who said it would lead to higher pollution and negatively impact Sidmouth’s businesses with customers not being able to park at Roxburgh for as long.
Cllr Fred Caygill (Exmouth Brixington) questioned why one in Sidmouth was being given unique status and not some others within the district, calling it 'totally wrong' and 'not democratic'.
But Cllr Jack Rowland (Democratic Alliance, Seaton) defended the plan, saying a number of other shoppers’ car park charges were going to be £1.50, including ones in Exmouth and another in Seaton.
Cllr Jake Bonetta (Labour, Honiton St Michael’s) welcomed the proposal.
“In the unique case of Sidmouth as a primary tourism hotspot in East Devon, we believe this strikes the right balance between promoting a high street and ensuring council services are not cut,” he said.
Some members asked for it to go back to a full council meeting for consideration, but leader Paul Arnott (Democratic Alliance, Coly Valley) pointed out they were in a full council meeting.
“You’ve got a chance to make a decision about Roxburgh. How many times do you want to dance around the head of this pin?” said Cllr Arnott, who accused the previous Tory administration of failing to address parking charges.
A separate motion on giving the authority’s cabinet responsibility for car parking matters was also narrowly passed, by 23 votes to 21, despite a number of councillors speaking against the move.
As well as criticising the recently-agreed increase in parking charges, they said it should be left for all council members to decide.
However, Cllr Arnott said work on policy had been left “unfinished” by the council’s car parking ‘task & finish forum’ run by the opposition and said cabinet was a “useful body in which to have the preliminary discussions.”