‘Love locks’ removed from Sidmouth’s Connaught Gardens over safety fears
- Credit: Archant
Council clamps down on trend that has come over from continent
Padlocks attached to fencing in Connaught Gardens as symbols of everlasting love have been removed by council officers - over safety fears their weight could destabilise the cliff-top.
The ‘love lock’ phenomenon started in Paris - where couples fixed the metal objects to the famous Pont de l’Archeveche to show their affection for one-another - and it is a trend that has spread throughout Europe.
Herald photographer Alex Walton last year spotted padlocks on railings in Sidmouth’s iconic gardens – one with the inscription: “Who needs Paris when you have Sidmouth, Valentines’ 2015.”
East Devon District Council (EDDC) has confirmed that the items had since been removed to prevent a precedent being set.
You may also want to watch:
An EDDC spokeswoman said: “Clipping padlocks onto a fence is a trend that has come over here from the continent.
“In Paris, these padlocks have now been removed as they posed a hazard to the bridges. We are concerned that this fashion doesn’t catch on in East Devon for similar reasons. For example, if too many padlocks were attached to a small piece of railing at the top of the cliff at Connaught Gardens, then the weight on the fence could cause it to become unstable and therefore dangerous.
- 1 It's our time to share our fortune and 'do our bit' as we start to re-open
- 2 Hayman's Butchers 'had been my life' - Stewart Hayman
- 3 There will be sunshine after the rain as the town re-opens
- 4 Sidmouth’s ‘overwhelming’ support for Wear a Hat fundraiser
- 5 Virtual donkey day out on Easter Sunday
- 6 Ella's walks raise more than £3,000 for brain tumour research
- 7 Rewarding first night back For Sidmouth Running Club
- 8 Claire leaves political spotlight
- 9 Town is spruced up as excitement is in the air for future
- 10 Salston Manor Hotel plans given the go-ahead
“As a precaution, our officers have been removing any padlocks they find attached to it to prevent a precedent being set.”