Ottery councillor cleared over code of conduct allegations
OTTERY S county councillor has been cleared by a local authority watchdog over allegations he breached code of conduct rules.
OTTERY'S county councillor has been cleared by a local authority watchdog over allegations he breached code of conduct rules.
Roger Giles has described accusations, believed to be centered on comments made over controversial footpath 46, which links Wiggaton to Tipton St John, as "ludicrous".
Devon County Council's (DCC) standards committee ruled last Tuesday (September 29) that councillor Giles had not broken ant rules.
A number of accusations had been levelled at Mr Giles concerning the content and views expressed by him in a newsletter published in October 2006.
You may also want to watch:
It was claimed he had failed to declare an interest during discussions by the council's Public Rights of Way Committee, and that the newsletter's content had failed to "treat others with respect".
Mr Giles has long campaigned to see the currently closed footpath, formerly part of a picturesque walk on the Eastern side of the River Otter, re-opened.
- 1 New owner sought for prominent Sidmouth seafront businesses
- 2 Supermarket chain planning four new stores in East Devon
- 3 It's official - Devon is one of the most popular places to live
- 4 Fundraiser makes brief stop on charity trek
- 5 Sporting tribute to club stalwart from grateful members
- 6 Organisers thrilled with super science festival turnout
- 7 'More visible' speed limit signs to be installed on A375 Sidbury Hill
- 8 Three designer handbags stolen from a shop in Sidmouth
- 9 Alderman honour for councillor devoted to serving community
- 10 Elusive mackerel still popping up for Devon anglers
He said: "My intention was purely and simply to let my constituents know what I have been doing in this respect, and to let them know how they can play a part in the process of DCC achieving a diversion, and thus re-opening, of the public right of way.
"To claim that I should have declared an interest, as the complainants did, is quite ludicrous, as I have no interest other than doing the best for my community.
"I most certainly will not be put off from doing so by complaints of this nature, whether in connection with the matter of footpath 46 or any other issues.